Introduction
Other times, it is not government leaders but markets that issue these kinds of warnings. Recently, Bloomberg analysts have called attention to the possibility of a full blown war between Iran and Israel, which may see oil prices go through the roof and thus a new stage of instability in the global economy.
This is not a theoretical prediction. Tensions in the Middle East have been simmering for months and airstrikes, naval clashes, threats have all added up to a series of news headlines with a growing degree of uncertainty. The worry is that a regional disagreement might mushroom into a conflict that can upend the very fabric of oil transport itself. And when oil gets affected, the whole world shakes.
The fragile heartbeat of global energy
The current economy remains, quite literally, an oil economy. About 20% of all global oil exports transit through the Strait of Hormuz, which is a narrow waterway separating Iran from the Arabian Peninsula. The Strait of Hormuz is globally recognized as the most vital energy choke point where approximately 21 million barrels of oil cross daily.
A war which either closes or hinders access to this strait will shock global markets if this war happens for a brief duration. Bloomberg.com predicts that prices will go above $120 or $150 a barrel if war goes deep.
This would be a repeat of the oil shocks of the past: 1973, 1990, and 2008, where geopolitics and economy collided in moments of recessions beyond the war zones.
The logic of panic
The oil markets are not simply driven by supply and demand principles but by anticipation and fear. “Investors react not to what happens but to what might happen next,” says a trader. Every time a rocket lands in the vicinity of a refinery or a tanker is intercepted en route, investors factor in the risk. “That war premium an invisible charge per barrel can go up in a matter of hours,” a trader explains.
Yet over the past months, this cost quietly came back. While production levels have remained level, prices have become increasingly reactive to news. The worry is less focused on now and more on the possibility of disruption how a regional war might change the dynamic in an instant.
Iran’s role: the double edged power
“Iran is both a player and a hub in this game. With seven percent of oil production in the world, it has a huge impact on oil. Its location gives it a strategic leverage, as any military action in Hormuz sends a message not just to Israelis but to international markets,”
Tehran has had this leverage in reserve all along. While sanctions are tightened, this means a possible shutdown of Routes or a cut in production. Then, when talks are resumed, this assures a degree of stability in exchange for lifting sanctions. However, if a direct conflict with Israel arises, such diplomatically clever maneuvering may descend into chaos which none in this part of the world can really control.
The problem of Israel & Western front
In particular, a heightened Iranian Israeli conflict can be very risky for Israelis. They will not have a war on their hands but rather disrupt an unstable Middle Eastern balance of powers and an already tired US diplomacy. Moreover, a public war will bring a worst case nightmare not only in form of a human crisis but an energy crisis in a state of economic exhaustion.
The Western economies, which are affected by post pandemic inflation, do not need a price hike in oil. The cost of energy affects all industries, including transport, food, and production. A heightened cost of oil can spark inflation when banks have just begun to loosen interest rates.
The ripple effect across emerging markets
The effects of an oil shock do not, in most cases, affect the Western nations alone. In emerging countries, it can have devastating effects. Countries such as India, Indonesia, or Egypt, being major importers of oil, will be immediately hit in terms of currencies and budgeting. Their subsidies will go up, deficits will widen, and inflation will soar.
Poor countries, which are already struggling with debts and an unstable currency, will face a second wave of inflation. Food prices will go up, transportation will become costly, and this will affect people before it affects their leaders. Such an impact will come at a time when a globally interlinked economy continues to weaken.
The market’s nervous silence
What makes this particular moment so fraught with tension is this feeling of holding one’s breath. Markets have priced in the risk but not in the reality. Investors understand that oil at $90 is manageable, but oil at $150 would be a different matter altogether a break point which can reshape investment patterns, profit margins, and money policies worldwide.
Meanwhile, traders are waiting for indications of escalation, such as wording in official statements, satellite images, tanker ship movement. With each indication of non escalation, relief trickles in; with each threat, fear revives. Perception dances to this rhythm, and the fate of global energy security rushes to keep up.
History’s reminder
The oil conflict connection dates to the origin of geopolitics. In 1973, an oil embargo by Arabs pushed prices up fourfold and triggered a recession in the West. In 1990, panic shopping ensued because of Iraq’s invasion of Kuwait. In 2019, a drone attack on a Saudi oil facility shook the oil market, despite a subsequent rebound in production.
But each crisis had one thing in common: once a loss of trust in oil supply occurs, years are required to regain it. “The oil market not only operates on barrels but on faith, faith in getting tomorrow’s delivery, faith in keeping the sea lanes open, and faith in not using energy as a weapon,” Clinton explained.
Restraining Power and Catastrophe
As things stand, diplomacy is currently all that separates them from chaos. Iran and Israel are acutely aware of this: they know dangers of a worst case outcome far outstrip any potential benefit in terms of nuclear gain. Other regional leaders such as Saudi Arabia or UAE, not to mention third party negotiators in Europe, are eager for a less dangerous situation because they are well aware of exactly what they are risking and it’s not just people’s lives.
Nevertheless, leeway for error is slim. One attack on a tanker, a wrongly interpreted radar pulse, a political maneuver might spark, according to Bloomberg, “the worst case energy scenario of the decade.”
Conclusion
If history is a teacher, then it shows that war in the Middle East never stays in the Middle East. The Iran Israel conflict is a global news story, one which extends from the Strait of Hormuz to Wall Street and from OPEC conferences to supermarket shelves.
Whether oil will soar or settle will have less to do with barrels and more to do with restraint with both sides being able to grasp that the world does not need another economy going up in flames. Because when oil turns into a weapon, *everyone* gets caught in the crossfire.
About the Author
